Bengis!

Muka bengis bolih menyebab orang menjadi takut, tambahan pula dengan misai melintang hehehe, ada yang semula jadi dan sebaliknya. Muka aje nampak bengis... tapi hati baik.. jangan mudah salah sangka atau membuat andaian sambarono kepada mereka yang berwajah bengis.

Ada yang jenis muka kesian tetapi mahu muka atau wajah nampak bengis, pelbagai cara dilakukan tetapi bukanlah dengan solekan wajah. Ada yang simpan misai pak belang dalam poket kononya musuh nampak kita akan menjadi takut. Namun bab misai pak belang ini, kalau masih baru dan ada bau lagi, erm bila anjing bau atau terhidu, mencanak larinya.

Kaedah orang dulu kadangkalanya menggunakan bacaan tertentu, katanya " Aku datang bagai pahlawan... bla bla bla..... hadapan ". Tak payahlah nak nampak muka bengis nih, daripada kawan ajak minum atau makan dah terlepas rezeki hehehe, sekadar nah cerita kepada generasi baru yang tak berapa nak percaya bab2 begini.

Berikhtiarkan mendapat wajah yang terdapat Nur yang Allah redhoi. Sejuk mata yang memandang dan dikasihi olih sekelian insan. Wallahu A'lam.

Strategic Management Process

Formulation

Formulation, the second phase in the strategic management process, produces a clear set of recommendations, with supporting justification, that revise as necessary the mission and objectives of the organization, and supply the strategies for accomplishing them.

In formulation, we are trying to modify the current objectives and strategies in ways to make the organization more successful. This includes trying to create "sustainable" competitive advantages -- although most competitive advantages are eroded steadily by the efforts of competitors.

There are four primary steps in this phase:

1. Reviewing the current key objectives and strategies of the organization, which usually would have been identified and evaluated as part of the diagnosis.
2. Identifying a rich range of strategic alternatives to address the strategy formulation.
3. Doing a balanced evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives relative to their feasibility plus expected effects on the issues and contributions to the success of the organization.
4. Deciding on the alternatives that should be recommended. or implemented

A good recommendation should be: effective in solving the stated problem(s), practical (can be implemented in this situation, with the resources available), feasible within a reasonable time frame, cost-effective, not overly disruptive, and acceptable to key "stakeholders" in the organization.

It is important to consider "fits" between resources plus competencies with opportunities, and also fits between risks and expectations.